This vibrant little novel (213 pages), printed in 2007, stands an exemplary chance of turning the careful student to some masterfully hidden limitation hold'em ninja. He comes down the game into two principles: playing the game, and playing with the enemy. He sets a detailed approach about how to look like a entire poker klutz, dish out a whuppin', leave the match with bags of cash, and also most importantly, render the distinct impression that you're merely a donk that lucked out. The match is aimed primarily at a live-play audience. Even the prose itself is yummy. Our hero is actually a story teller, and it isn't difficult to believe that he is also a novelist, as maintained deposit via pulsa. The publication begins by explicitly stating its own purpose, in large capital letters:"READ THIS BOOK IF YOU Ought to Avoid THE LIMELIGHT, YET BE A CONSISTENT WINNER AT THE POKER TABLE." His self-disclosure perhaps points out a few of his motivation. He claims to have already been knocked from the WSOP Main function, only before the final table. He lost to a atrocious suck-out, hauled by not as Stu Ungar, that went onto win the bracelet. This appears to have been a revelation to our author: no-limit hold'em, especially tournament style, can be actually a crapshoot, performed by people who crave fame. Steady funds can be found at the limit tables, especially with cleverly disguised skills. Although I like no limit myself, it's refreshing to see that a vastly different outlook, notably one with such fantastic humour. So, how can you seem such as a pigeon? The keys involve image management and a fundamental understanding of the mad chances of this game. In the event that it is possible to learn how to check at some guy giving you a lecture in a bad overcome using a blank stare of confusion, then you are well on your own way. In the event you combine this understanding with all the statistical oddity that any two-hole cards will probably hit on a flop hard one time , then you definitely have the makings of a donk in disguise. In a normal session of limitation, choose 15 or so stabs at the pot in ludicrously early location with crap. Lift this up. In the event you reach tough, then play down it to the ending featuring all of the inexplicable moves like checking the flop and increasing the turn. Then, once the man in position (who did everything"directly" that a la Sklansky) blasts you for no knowledge of poker at all, you simply give a confused smile. At any time you overlook, you just dump your hands, and no body believes twice. My favorite thing,"Tells Don't Tell - Folks Can," can be really a review of informs. The author believes the notion of Kreskin-like forces of reading a villain's gap cards idiotic. He supplies a thorough analysis of this vital hand amongst Sammy Farha and also Chris Moneymaker in your 2003 main-event, indicating that additional attention into the gambling patterns of the hand, instead of into the individual himself, may have made Sammy the bracelet, instead of having his pile supplied by way of a stone cold bluff onto the river. He moves over the gamers' behaviours at length after which replays the exact same hand as though it were played online, without a betting patterns available. I don't know if I am quite convinced with his arguments, especially when reading Joe Navarro, however, it's really a good reminder that 90% of what you want to find out comes from the player's activities , not from whether he bets with the lefthand along with the right .